Skip to main content
tech• IN

AI Advances Ignite Fear of Job Loss and Social Upheaval

Public voices alarm over rapid automation and its potential to disrupt lives and communities

Staff Writer

AI gets better and people freak out about jobs and society

Fear about artificial intelligence is getting louder. Tech keeps moving fast and lots of folks worry about losing work, money problems, and whole towns falling apart. Some say if we don’t step in, the good parts of AI won’t reach everyone.

"Change is coming too fast," wrote @RayDalio. "We could end up with two worlds—one where the people who get AI win big, and one where everyone else gets left behind and gives up."

Ray Dalio runs Bridgewater Associates. His company handles hundreds of billions in investments. He says we need big money and school fixes so workers can handle AI running both factory and office jobs. Left alone, he warns, the shift could make people fight more and stop trusting leaders.

Others say we’re not moving fast enough. "We’re walking toward trouble with our eyes closed," wrote @c_nemri. "No one’s ready for the wave of job losses coming. Governments still see this as a slow problem instead of a ticking bomb."

AI keeps proving it can do expert work like legal research and medical tests. That means lots of jobs could vanish soon. Some say new kinds of work will pop up. Others ask if it will happen fast enough to keep people from hurting.

"The jobs people know are going away. The new ones need skills most folks don’t have," wrote @michael_lwy. "This isn’t just about coding. It’s about knowing how to work and talk in a world run by AI."

Lwy builds software and teaches digital skills. He points to studies that say over 30% of today’s jobs could be done by machines in ten years. Roles like office paperwork and basic data work are most at risk. Lwy wants more money for schools and training. He says focus should be on learning to think and solve problems across different subjects.

Some call the fear overdone. They say every big tech jump has scared people at first. "Every change brought doom talk," wrote @MrUnPolite. "Yet here we still are. But this time feels different—the speed and depth are scarier than before."

This fight is about fairness vs. progress. AI can make things cheaper and speed up medicine—great news. But it’s unclear who actually benefits. Economists and thinkers say without rules, AI could just give more cash to the people who make it. That could make the rich richer and split society apart.

Dalio says leaders should step in. Ideas like testing basic income, tax breaks for learning new skills, and stronger rules for gig workers could help. "We can’t just let markets fix this," he wrote. "The deal we have with society is on the line."

AI is showing up everywhere now—self-driving trucks, chatbots that handle customer calls. That makes the worries even bigger. The big question now is whether we can build the systems and rules to keep progress from wrecking things.

If we don’t act together, fear could turn to anger. That could lead to fights and people rejecting tech altogether. The other choice—getting ready now—means planning ahead, spending money, and rethinking how we learn, work, and help each other in a world run by AI.

Only time will tell if we can handle the shift before it’s too late.

What could go wrong if we don’t handle AI better

If AI kicks people out of work without a plan, the damage could be huge. Dalio says steady jobs that kept the middle class alive could vanish. That could crash spending, shrink tax dollars, and make home prices wobble.

"When people lose jobs—or worse, their sense of worth—the damage spreads past money," Dalio wrote. "It hits minds, families, and even how much people care about their town."

Others fear a gap between who can afford AI help and who can’t. "@c_nemri" wrote: "If rich folks have AI tutors, AI doctors, AI lawyers, they’ll always have the edge. Everyone else gets locked out."

That could split cities from small towns. Tech-heavy areas would zoom ahead while places without tech jobs fall behind. The end result could be a country divided not just by cash, but by who gets to use the machines of the future.

This isn’t guesswork anymore. Some states already run AI pilot programs in health care and schools. Companies are using AI tools fast. The question isn’t if AI will change the economy—it’s if we can change fast enough to stay ahead.

The next ten years will decide if tech lifts everyone up—or just the few at the top while the rest struggle.

One thing’s clear—the people sounding alarms aren’t just a few cranks. Investors, coders, teachers, and regular workers all ask the same thing: How do we move forward without leaving so many people behind?

No one has an easy answer. But we need one—and fast.

Sources

  • 1.
    @CristinaCriddle · Cristina Criddle

    📣 Some news after a busy day… 📣 Today is my last shift on the tech news desk. It’s been an incredible four years working at the BBC and I’m so thankful for the experiences I've had. Indulge me in some highlights… https://t.co/TMPh2hdN6h

    View on X.com →
  • 2.
    @marthagimbel · Martha Gimbel

    So one thing to think about with “new jobs due to technological advances” is that it’s not just jobs that are made possible due to technology…it’s jobs that we are now rich enough to pay for! Take makeup artists. 1/

    View on X.com →
  • 3.
    @asemota · Osaretin Victor Asemota

    I think this is the first place real technology advancements should happen locally. Without it, we are wasting our time. Proper voter registration can also provide a new layer for tech ventures to understand our true demography and build better products.

    View on X.com →
  • 4.
    @PlottrApp · Plottr

    I like how this guy thinks 😉

    View on X.com →
  • 5.
    @CoachGoldsmith · Marshall Goldsmith

    With the rapid advancement of new technology, the job market is more uncertain than it has been in years. Your company is not going to be responsible for your career. Your manager is not going to be responsible for your career. Like it or not, only you are going to be https://t.co/WyumhclSi5

    View on X.com →
  • 6.
    @JonesHowDareYou · Jenny Difficult-Frecklington-Jones 🇵🇸🍉🇮🇷

    Personally, I think we should have stopped human advancements in technology around here. I mean—like TV, the internet has done a lot to make people stupider, & now with AI poised to take over millions if not billions of jobs b/c it's cheaper than paying 👩🏻‍💼👨🏻‍💼—pfft. Big mistake. https://t.co/BioMWb82dz

    View on X.com →
  • 7.
    @RoKhanna · Ro Khanna

    @friedberg Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Innovation and technological advance is patriotic and good for humanity provided it serves people. So we need to think about how it is adopted and how people can still have meaningful work and independence. A tax code that doesn't incentivize

    View on X.com →
  • 8.
    @_jasonwei · Jason Wei

    Prediction: within the next year there will be a pretty sharp transition of focus in AI from general user adoption to the ability to accelerate science and engineering. For the past two years it has been about user base and general adoption across the public. This is very

    View on X.com →
  • 9.
    @togelius · Julian Togelius

    I remember being excited about AI. I remember 20 years ago, being excited about neuroevolutionary methods for learning adaptive behaviors in video games. And I remember three years ago, mouth watering at the thought of tasty experiments in putting language models inside

    View on X.com →
  • 10.
    @aclib · AC Library

    Our website and catalog are currently experiencing errors and slow loading. You may not be able to log in, search, or access your account. Please use the basic catalog. Thanks for your patience as we work on resolving this. https://t.co/kHZ90qh9Uu

    View on X.com →
  • 11.
    @toasterlighting · Celene is at Manifest

    why do so many big tech companies have poorly designed websites which are slow, crash often, and generally have a bad user experience

    View on X.com →
  • 12.
    @natmiletic · Nat Miletic

    Google doesn't care what CMS you use. It cares if your site is slow, has broken links, or serves a terrible mobile experience. WordPress, Webflow, Framer, headless... doesn't matter. Performance and authority matter. Your "old school agency" warning about platform migrations

    View on X.com →
  • 13.
    @mreflow · Matt Wolfe

    Reflecting on 2023... Milestones and lessons: I promise I'll get back to sharing AI news, tips, and tutorials here on X. But news has been sooo slow for the last few weeks so there hasn't been much to talk about. (Things will ramp up next week with CES happening, I'm sure)

    View on X.com →
  • 14.
    @thinking_slow · Ryan Law

    content marketing is going through the biggest step-change since Google appeared. one personal example: i have an old website i built a decade ago. the content was old, the design was old, i had no time to improve it. resigned to a slow death. c'est la vie. but now: i migrated

    View on X.com →
  • 15.
    @PalmerLuckey · Palmer Luckey

    It is always weird when media outlets paint me as biased in wanting big tech to be more involved with the military, as if wanting more competitors is the natural state of things. No! I want it because I care about America's future, even it is means Anduril is a smaller fish.

    View on X.com →
  • 16.
    @JSyversen · Jason Syversen

    Lots of people have commented on Wired magazine being so biased and negative and spending their energy bashing tech, despite being a “tech magazine”. While some might find that surprising, anyone on social media knows ragebating works. The best way to farm engagement is

    View on X.com →
  • 17.
    @DylanByers · Dylan Byers

    New statement from Scott Pelley:   There has never been anything in America like 60 Minutes.   The Sunday tradition is the most successful program of any kind in history. For more than a decade, its innovative growth on every major online platform has extended its reach to

    View on X.com →
  • 18.
    @julesterpak · Jules

    This article has a lot of great information, but such an emphasis on “right-wing backlash” is misleading “Before long, public figures and news outlets with large right-wing audiences claimed, using dubious evidence, that their tests of Gemini showed Google had a hidden agenda

    View on X.com →
  • 19.
    @garrytan · Garry Tan

    “Technology is simply applied knowledge. Tools spread because they deliver real value: saving time, lowering costs, extending life, and expanding capability. You can slow adoption through regulation or social pressure, but you cannot suppress tools that materially improve human https://t.co/bQbxZcFXIZ

    View on X.com →
  • 20.
    @tech_queen · Chisom Nwokwu🌟

    🎓Georgia Tech Master’s Series - Episode 1 I wrapped up my first semester at Georgia Institute of Technology and one of the courses I took was Al Ethics & Society and I got an A!!!🎉 As Al becomes increasingly integrated into our daily lives, it’s not enough to know how to https://t.co/HcJRfq961K

    View on X.com →

Stay in the loop

Get the top stories delivered to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.